<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: When Web Analytics Lie</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.bryaneisenberg.com/2009/09/when-web-analytics-lie/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.bryaneisenberg.com/2009/09/when-web-analytics-lie/</link>
	<description>Professional Speakers, Best Selling Authors, Online Marketing Pioneers</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 11 Mar 2010 21:54:17 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Yvonne DiVita</title>
		<link>http://www.bryaneisenberg.com/2009/09/when-web-analytics-lie/comment-page-1/#comment-2</link>
		<dc:creator>Yvonne DiVita</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Sep 2009 15:16:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bryaneisenberg.com/?p=95#comment-2</guid>
		<description>I&#039;d like someone to write about the opposite problem: as an individual, you&#039;re getting lots of notice, lots of invitations to speak, are well regarded throughout the net, receive emails from readers who rave about you...routinely get asked to be interviewed, but your web &quot;stats&quot; don&#039;t show much of anything.

Are the stats wrong? Is the client&#039;s reputation ahead of reporting tools? Should the client just ignore the stats - and be glad of all the &quot;real&quot; attention? Is there a way to qualify what this means?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;d like someone to write about the opposite problem: as an individual, you&#8217;re getting lots of notice, lots of invitations to speak, are well regarded throughout the net, receive emails from readers who rave about you&#8230;routinely get asked to be interviewed, but your web &#8220;stats&#8221; don&#8217;t show much of anything.</p>
<p>Are the stats wrong? Is the client&#8217;s reputation ahead of reporting tools? Should the client just ignore the stats &#8211; and be glad of all the &#8220;real&#8221; attention? Is there a way to qualify what this means?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
