No one knows exactly when the first advertisement was published on a printing press. We do know: In 1609, a British newspaper published an ad for migration opportunities to America. For hundreds of years, ads and print went hand and hand. Then came the Internet. AT&T was the first to pay HotWired to display the first ever online ad; a 468 x 60 banner that came to life on October 25, 1994.
Do you remember the days of explosive CPMs? Many people long for those times – before rates for traditional banner ad plummeted just as the market crashed from 2000 through 2002. These banner ads couldn’t support those rates because low click-through rates (CTR) and conversions didn’t justify the spend. To find ways to make online ads justify premium prices, publishers have had to experiment with all kinds of formats, including all intrusive full-page overlays to the content the reader is after. This still wasn’t the answer any one was hoping for.
There have even been attempts at changing the nature of print ads. Everything from CBS embedding a video screen into an “Entertainment Weekly” magazine to creating ads that you place your iPhone over to make the rest of the ad “come to life” like this example from AXA.
Then along came Steve Jobs (I wish him a quick return to health), and the introduction of the iPad.Nearly 15 million iPads sold this past year. This year’s Consumer Electronics Show (CES) seemed to be a lot about iPad accessories or iPad “killers” and the nature of consuming content is changing dramatically. And as part of that change, it seems that advertisements have changed as well.
While many magazine publishers are still struggling at grabbing subscription revenue from their iPad digital magazines, a recently completed study by Alex Wang, Ph.D., on behalf of Adobe is showing the effectiveness of ads placed in these digital magazines. Participants in the study who saw the interactive ads had stronger engagement, message involvement, and attitude than participants who viewed the same static ad in a print magazine. Participants who engaged with the interactive ads also perceived stronger interactivity than the participants who saw the static ad. It is easy to speculate that higher ad interactivity could generate higher brand awareness.
All this interactivity combines the best elements of consuming printed content with the Web’s full interactivity. Best of all, the tracking of metrics is built right in. Now publishers and advertisers can find out how people really are engaging with their ads and content. This is why a software company like Adobe acquired Web analytics company Omniture; it saw where publishing was headed and how all this fit into Adobe’s Publishing Suite. Next step, Adobe just acquired audience optimization firm DemDex.
Matt Langie, an Adobe senior director, told PaidContent: “Audience optimization, which we define as putting all of the data that a publisher collects and matching it to an advertiser looking to reach a specific segment of those users, is the key driver of online advertising’s growth.”
It won’t be long until advertisements in digital magazines will be personalized based on a reader’s past participation with content and ads, location, time of day, etc. Might this also be where book publishing’s future is headed? Perhaps there will soon be interactive books that are free but supported through targeted advertisements or additional embedded content? The future is always interesting.


[...] - The first advertisement was published in a British newspaper in 1609. It was an ad for migration opportunities to America. (Source) [...]
This is a great post and I agree with your point of view.
But I do have one question. You said- "Participants in the study who saw the interactive ads had stronger engagement, message involvement, and attitude than participants who viewed the same static ad in a print magazine"
Couldn't part of this be explained as novelty factor?
Yes, in some ways it could be. But the ads do have more relevant content and seem to inform better than standard ads – see http://www.emarketer.com/Article.aspx?R=1008210.
Advertisements are already becoming personalized to your online persona. Facebook puts up ads for bands you like, or schools and businesses that are local to you. Many of the ads that come up when you search are for things you've recently searched for. Even some of the emails in your spam folder in your email seem to know what to try to sell you.
If you've been looking for a job, if you're looking at how to get published, and even some of the articles you read seem to be tracked so you get that kind of spam in your inbox.
It's kind of creepy being tracked like that, and I don't know how they do it, but if you're aware of it, it's easy to notice, though not easy to stop.
It is a delicate balance not to seem to intrusive or stalkerish. While websites have been doing this for a while, magazines and books have not experimented with it.
are ads such a good idea in a book? I'm thinking about novels here. An author spends a lot of time and effort getting the reader hooked into a scene. It's hard. Would it really be a good idea to then tempt the reader to go look at an advertisement? The tension of the story is broken and the opinions of the writer will probably go down, as will the book sales as readers think the book wasn't very captivating. I do not think anyone likes commercials in a movie, and I struggle to see how ads in a book would be any different.
I like to think of ad-supported free content as a positive thing. Its very easy to think negatively about these highly targeted ads as they do require a certain amount of user data to be relevant. Ultimately though I would rather see relevant ads than irrelevant ones, and it return get content for free.
The only danger is that we lose great content as it becomes too focused on the advertising business model. This is why I will always have a soft spot for organisations like the bbc.
I have a different view on the future of publishing and advertising, and it doesn't involve ads at all. As others pointed out, people come for the content and not for the ads. I suggest that any business who benefits from the content, link, and traffic will compensate the publisher for it.
Online it's easy to count pageviews/clicks, and put a value tag on it.
We have built http://publishedin.com to allow just that.
What do you think?